Today's hottest deals

Biostar NM70I-1007U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar NM70I-1007U  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 73.1
45% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 82.1
8-Core 80.7
11% 81.4 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110F) 778MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.03
0% 0.79 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 57 60 60 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 54.3
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 57.8
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FH8N0TNSDR 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NM70I-1007U Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar NM70I-1007U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback