Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4510U 63,054 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 124 62% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 175 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2246) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.62 Parallax 4.69 2% 3.63 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 5.13 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 85 118 52 29 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 392 Write 369 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 109 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 100%
WD My Passport 2627 1TB 923 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 850GB free, PID 2627 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 109 106 112 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 124 Write 106 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 110 137% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.8 254% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170MN68F9F1600 RMT3170EF68F9W1600 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	40x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	34x
HD Graphics Family (PHDGD Skylake v2.9)IntelBench 3%, 81 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 2,338 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	4x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80