Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '17 at 11:36
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 86.7
1-Core 47
2-Core 92.7
50% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 140
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 14.6
12% 13.7 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 332
Write 148
Mixed 110
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 8.52
33% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 6.95
12% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
857GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 88.7
Write 82.3
Mixed 23.5
47% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.19
69% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
8GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Read 31
Write 7.52
Mixed 11.3
17% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.12
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.06
22% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback