HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime11 Days
Run DateMar 09 '17 at 16:41
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 534
53% 434 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1909) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 7
4% 6.63 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.39
6% 6.85 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
342GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 490
Write 338
Mixed 349
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 24.2
107% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 60.9
84% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 500GB
329GB free
Firmware: EXT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 488
Write 166
Mixed 352
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 18.3
99% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 62.3
82% 154 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 119%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 491
Write 335
Mixed 346
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 17.9
97% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 38
DQ Write 47.5
DQ Mixed 18
20% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback