Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault SKYBAY
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime24.7 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 306
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.22
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 14.2
8% 8.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSMS180S3256GJ 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 161 107 42 95 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 484
Write 384
Mixed 347
SusWrite 103
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 41.5
160% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 210
184% 272 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6P1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback