Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 543
59% 468 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 87
58% 76 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 57.6
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R5SL120G 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 63 27 64 36 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 463
Write 405
Mixed 346
SusWrite 94.8
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 67.3
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 31.5
25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
342GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 122 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 121
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 29.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback