Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 122 57% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 363 36% 296 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 40.8 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.8 33% 37.2 fps	MRender 39.4 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 38 32% 39 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P4-240 238GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.09.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 73 35 21 13 18 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.5% Average	Read 178 Write 173 Mixed 205 SusWrite 37.2 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 23.9 90% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 8.8 38% 84 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 31GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 67 58 64 74 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 61.5 Write 60 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 64.6 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 101GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 138 157 153 154 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 159 Write 150 Mixed 31 SusWrite 141 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter06.A00LF Atermiter06.A00LF 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1045TAMD $165Bench 54%, 5,709 samples	2x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	2x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
520 Series 60GBIntelBench 62%, 1,135 samples	1x

RAM
BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 153 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 8,627 samples	1x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 7,217 samples	1x

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $285

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16