Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,134
100% 851 Pts
64-Core 2,144
133% 2,144 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 178
Parallax 192
155% 187 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 165
Splatting 115
128% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,609
Write 1,074
Mixed 984
270% 1,222 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 45.7
230% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 70.5
235% 496 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 228%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
243GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 320 317 326 327 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 437
Mixed 362
SusWrite 322
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 54.1
178% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
405GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.4 2.4 0.8 0.8 8.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Read 187
Write 141
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 2.8
124% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA100V 1TB
850GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 108 118 118 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
Read 146
Write 110
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 114
123% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1 0.8 0.1 0.1 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 1.6
103% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 108 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 114
158% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 34.3
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 33.6
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback