Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	62% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 122 55% 89 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 390 38% 310 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V5700 (FireGL) 209 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 2542) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 8.23 Parallax 3.06 5% 5.66 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 7.83 5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MDT MD1200BEVS-00RST0 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.01G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 23 28 34 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.3% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 36.9 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 31.4 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JDZS51272PZ1G4F Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 36JDZS51272PZ1G4F Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 36JDZS51272PZ1G4F Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 36JDZS51272PZ1G4F 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 29.7 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.3 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373