Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 242
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 730
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 74.1
61% 75.4 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 72
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 283 295 301 299 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 465
Mixed 431
SusWrite 294
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 61.5
203% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 251
215% 317 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
764GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 3.7 4 5.8 5.3 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 16.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 24.5
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
214GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 53 55 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 75.2
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 53.9
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 51%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
27GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 38.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 0.3
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 39%
CLOVER CD103UJ 1TB
15GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 9.1 28 37 32 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 22
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 30
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 21%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
333GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Read 38.4
Write 35.4
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 0.1
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
9GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 32 14 5 9.7 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 36.9
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 11.7
38% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback