Asrock X99 Professional/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional/3.1  (all builds)
Memory15.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 03:55
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 89
2-Core 171
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 424
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 145
Parallax 150
118% 146 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 137
Splatting 102
107% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 235 227 193 179 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 404
Write 378
Mixed 325
SusWrite 204
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 39.5
134% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 349
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86%
Great: 131%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
168GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 245 247 247 246 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 386
Write 252
Mixed 150
SusWrite 246
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 20.8
91% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 57.3
105% 212 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 85%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
121GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 192 196 196 185 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 367
Write 348
Mixed 225
SusWrite 197
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 24.2
107% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 171
152% 231 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 121%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 234 248 269 285 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 391
Write 369
Mixed 305
SusWrite 257
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 34.4
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 221
200% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 148 148 149 149 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 159
Write 116
Mixed 74
SusWrite 147
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C15-4GRKD F4-3200C15-4GRKD F4-3200C15-4GRKD F4-3200C15-4GRKD CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.6% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional/3.1 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback