MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User PNG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 963
86% 727 Pts
64-Core 2,434
151% 2,434 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 154
Parallax 164
133% 160 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 133
Splatting 102
106% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 452 286 295 295 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 466
Mixed 448
SusWrite 348
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 50.4
164% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 301
225% 299 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
78GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 467 336 316 317 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 468
Mixed 452
SusWrite 370
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 51.2
169% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 294
222% 296 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 126%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$81
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 170 172 172 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 148
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 170
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
376% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 110%
Sony Hard Drive 1TB
233GB free, PID 0b7e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 0 2.5 1.8 0.6 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 92.8
Write 126
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 2.5
102% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.9 4 4.2 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 15.4
Mixed 11.4
SusWrite 4
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.4
125% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M1D3000C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
173% Outstanding
MC Read 71.1
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 68.5
198% 69.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 173%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback