HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory122.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 65.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 275
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 966
91% 752 Pts
64-Core 1701
105% 1701 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1706 2016 2015 2019 2014 2029 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,546
Write 1,807
Mixed 1605
SusWrite 1,967
392% 1,731 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 58
222% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 866
653% 890 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 290%
Great: 496%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 412 412 414 412 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 405
Mixed 380
SusWrite 409
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 23.2
126% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 41.2
93% 187 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-062.A00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 9.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 175%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback