Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141210
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 10:38
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770R
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 54.2
31% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 86.7
8-Core 378
24% 232 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 135 58 48 66 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 421
Write 213
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 103
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 13.2
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 1.1
48% 113 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 86%
SABRENT 128GB
95GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 199 186 196 191 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 346
Write 192
Mixed 206
SusWrite 193
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 10.1
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 47
36% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1866 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 29.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.5
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M4HM87P-00 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback