Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 15:24
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 115
52% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 187
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 12.8
6% 9.34 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 9.97
Splatting 7.96
6% 7.75 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
727GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 59 48 74 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 40
Write 86.5
Mixed 36
SusWrite 64.9
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 139 144 141 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 70.8
Write 108
Mixed 66
SusWrite 138
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
23GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.21% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 8.8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 8.4
16% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 18%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
4GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.1 5.1 5 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 5
10% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 12.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback