MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 16:09
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 316
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,015
99% 810 Pts
64-Core 1574
97% 1574 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 138
Reflection 115
Parallax 206
112% 153 fps
Gravity 132
Splatting 160
132% 146 fps
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 813 811 808 806 824 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,681
Write 2,414
Mixed 1,876
SusWrite 1,058
449% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 83.7
272% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 474
479% 799 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 299%
Great: 355%
TSA 256GB 256GB
235GB free
Firmware: S0425A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 131 131 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 276
Write 204
Mixed 248
SusWrite 156
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 35.5
117% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 40.2
32% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 83 82 83 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 60
Write 76.3
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 79.2
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
184% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
807GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 203 204 204 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 148
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 203
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 64GB
59GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 5 7.3 5.7 4 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 1.8
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 6.1
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.8
117% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 4GB
4GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5 4.9 4.5 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 13.7
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 4.9
10% 8.07 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,468
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback