HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2048 x 1536 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '17 at 22:27
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 90
2-Core 194
59% 111 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 601
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,590
98% 1,590 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D
Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Lighting 9.03
Reflection 8.19
Parallax 10.3
7% 9.17 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 11.7
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S1 128GB
62GB free
Firmware: 0000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 421
Write 328
Mixed 365
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 14.8
90% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 56.7
67% 122 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70%
Great: 97%
Sandisk SD7SB6S1 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 381
Write 307
Mixed 308
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 7.38
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 13.3
37% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 33.1
69% 138 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 97%
OWC Elite Pro U3FW 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a2a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 176
Write 177
Mixed 88.5
181% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.22
85% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB1-CRC Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A1G40DB1-CRC Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.6% Good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback