Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 05:23
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$315
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 142
56% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 588
46% 411 Pts
64-Core 2,140
132% 2,140 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 121
Parallax 126
100% 123 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 115
Splatting 104
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 367 391 398 394 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 412
Mixed 411
SusWrite 378
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 174
139% 194 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
183GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 345 320 323 313 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 445
Write 412
Mixed 308
SusWrite 323
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 38.2
130% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 204
152% 201 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 123%
514GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 35.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 18.4
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 106%
557GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 18.4
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 113%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 100
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 94.4
124% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.5
252% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
830GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 36
Write 37
Mixed 23
SusWrite 37.3
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 24.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback