Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '20 at 07:44
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 73.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 852 79% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,272 79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C759) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3570 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.8% Very good	Lighting 90.6 Reflection 82.7 Parallax 85.3 74% 86.2 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 75.8 Splatting 73 71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,049 Write 4,864 Mixed 5,361 1,208% 5,425 MB/s	4K Read 342 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 169 815% 221 MB/s	DQ Read 1,024 DQ Write 490 DQ Mixed 314 351% 609 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Adata SU760 512GB 1,247 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 144GB free Firmware: XA001R29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 438 435 438 437 437 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 435 Mixed 409 SusWrite 437 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 47.6 157% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 98.2 131% 237 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%
SSD-DCXGCC-480G 480GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 447GB free Firmware: S0813A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 451 450 452 452 451 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 484 Write 451 Mixed 349 SusWrite 452 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 17 75% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 66.9 DQ Write 21.5 DQ Mixed 22.6 22% 37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD44G266681 Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 PSD44G266681 Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 27.3 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 25.2 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	842x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	298x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	92x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	74x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	181x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16