Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 27.2 2-Core 56.2 25% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 69.8 8-Core 97.9 10% 83.9 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320 2,109 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 1.53 3% 3.27 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 2.87 Splatting 3.13 3% 3.59 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 79 78 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 73.2 Write 102 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 80.4 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 4x2GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x

SSD
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	10x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GBToshibaBench 34%, 148 samples	9x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	8x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $151