Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio XPS 7100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 7100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FF3FN
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 41
2-Core 80.3
40% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 157
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 10.8
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 15.7
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 48 50 50 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 223
Write 202
Mixed 200
SusWrite 49.2
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 15.8
44% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 65.6
58% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24
100GB free
Firmware: 8.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 49 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 49.7
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 32%
WD My Passport 750GB
421GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 20 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 19.7
33% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD KP223C-ELD Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 6GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 7100 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 7100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback