Toshiba SATELLITE C850-1MF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C850-1MF  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory10.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '17 at 20:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 116
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 175
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 3.06
3% 3.52 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 3.61
3% 3.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 78.1
Write 83.3
Mixed 87.2
63% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 CMSO8GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback