Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 21:54
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 148
53% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 287
36% 275 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Asus(1043 0553) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 23.8
14% 22.7 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 29.8
21% 24.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 130 58 22 61 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 341
Write 276
Mixed 25
SusWrite 83.9
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 10.2
44% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 1.2
68% 163 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
315GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 124 121 122 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 100
Write 120
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 122
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 88%
ASMT 2115 1TB
828GB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 108 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 107
122% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback