Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20238

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20238  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '17 at 08:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 47.5
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 41.5
26% 37.5 Pts
4-Core 60.4
8-Core 60.1
8% 60.2 Pts
64-Core 59.9
4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 1.19
0% 1.02 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 72.2
Mixed 78.4
55% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.23
58% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20238 Builds (Compare 1,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback