Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 09:21
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 131
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 376
37% 302 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 67.6
41% 50.7 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 39.1
33% 39.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 148 119 141 151 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 412
Write 205
Mixed 204
SusWrite 136
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 21.8
87% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 108
89% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
78GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 67 63 73 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 59.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 67.8
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36%
Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 80 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 41.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 80.9
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback