Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 214 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 502 51% 415 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 Ti OEM 1,817 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1074) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (80^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 31.2 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 40.2 25% 34.4 fps	MRender 45.6 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 33 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 193 194 191 171 182 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 420 Write 192 Mixed 190 SusWrite 183 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 20 75% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 113 100% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 76%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$54 5,596 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 720GB free Firmware: SN12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 96 98 99 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 106 Write 128 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 96.9 69% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x 4x4GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 30.4 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 12.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16