HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 15:30
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$31
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 83
2-Core 130
52% 89 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 194
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.18 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 85
Mixed 35.7
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ RD 2TB
889GB free
Firmware: 0143
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11
Write 10.2
Mixed 11
8% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 64%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
54GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 18
Write 0.7
Mixed 10.2
10% 9.63 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
17% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback