Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 145 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 330 36% 283 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 04CA) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 1.88 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 2.17 2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN 25SATAS3 1TB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0822A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 55 52 52 52 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 451 Write 401 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 84 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 0.6 36% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 34.6 41% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1,263x
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	379x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	297x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	88x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	68x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	50x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16