QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive14.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory31.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26.7 GB free of 31.3799 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 23:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 876
88% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 86
81% 92.3 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 83.2
Splatting 77
75% 94 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 123 135 107 81 131 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.5% Very poor
Read 157
Write 118
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 110
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
5% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 91%
Qemu HARDDISK 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 169 168 170 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 157
Mixed 134
SusWrite 166
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 1.4
470% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15749 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 31.4
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 28.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback