Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 04:29
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$94
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 884
82% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 99.6
64% 85.4 fps
MRender 76.2
Gravity 80
Splatting 63.9
59% 73.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 766GB
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2824 2864 2913 1287 771 771 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,660
Write 3,148
Mixed 1,501
SusWrite 1,905
518% 2,304 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 44.6
157% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 719
540% 720 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 303%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
175% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 86.9
MC Mixed 63.9
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 175%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback