To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 16:48
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 65
2-Core 90.8
51% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 99.2
8-Core 117
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2872) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 31.2
21% 26.8 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 24.8
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 88 88 103 118 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 54.5
Write 111
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 98.7
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 112%
Adata DashDrive UV150 USB 3.0 32GB-$22
12GB free, PID dc1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Read 30.1
Write 9
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 5.6
14% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback