Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '20 at 21:28
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 50.7 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 30.3 24% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 28.2 8-Core 30.4 4% 29.3 Pts	64-Core 28.7 2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 93 120 127 125 120 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 166 Write 121 Mixed 130 SusWrite 117 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 11 39% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 73.5 DQ Write 43.8 DQ Mixed 58.3 44% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1334, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.9 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	10x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	2x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 45%, 249 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28