MSI X58 PLATINUM SLI(MS-7522)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7522
MotherboardMSI X58 PLATINUM SLI(MS-7522)  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 03:22
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 37
2-Core 66.2
35% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 85.9
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 78
5% 78 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6 H500R0 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 23.1
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 30
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.1
129% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 60GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 PLATINUM SLI(MS-7522) Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI X58 PLATINUM SLI(MS-7522)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback