Today's hottest deals

EVGA 132-KS-E277

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 132-KS-E277  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 22:58
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 629
62% 508 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 469 143 140 148 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 2,055
Write 145
Mixed 138
SusWrite 212
135% 638 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 60.5
196% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 492
369% 496 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 179%
Great: 382%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 670 632 710 685 676 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 0
16% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA HDWN180 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 50 49 55 49 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
Read 57.6
Write 84.8
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 50.1
90% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 65%
ST12000N M0008-2H3101 12TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 50 49 55 49 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.9% Poor
Read 87.1
Write 69.3
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 50.2
90% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 94%
ST12000N M0008-2H3101 12TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 146 144 162 146 156 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
Read 57.9
Write 84.5
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 148
129% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-KS-E277 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: EVGA 132-KS-E277

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback