Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U 3,165 User benchmarks, average bench 55% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 176 62% 109 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 355 47% 351 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics 17 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	8.98% Terrible	Lighting 9.53 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 14.4 8% 11.6 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 18.2 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.98% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPITJ256PED2MWX 256GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFR12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1137 Write 932 Mixed 948 224% 1,006 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 37.5 141% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 696 DQ Write 691 DQ Mixed 697 523% 695 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 188%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 25.6 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 21.2 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	19x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 9%, 211 samples	10x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 56 samples	7x

SSD
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x
HFS256G32TNF-N3A0A 256GBBench 78%, 1,183 samples	6x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 198%, 9,460 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 55%, 2,394 samples	9x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	5x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 61%, 62 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16