Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 511 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 76.9 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 94.5 48% 73.9 Pts	4-Core 96.4 8-Core 98.4 13% 97.4 Pts	64-Core 91.2 6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200 10,090 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 191 85 71 69 70 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 685GB free Firmware: JP3OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 140 138 139 140 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 137 Write 139 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 138 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 10.2 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Phenom II X2 511AMDBench 45%, 210 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	1x

RAM
M378B2873FH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 5GBSamsungBench 27%, 11 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16