Neousys Nuvo-7100VTC Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNeousys Nuvo-7100VTC Series  (all builds)
MotherboardNeousys NVS-7000
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 10:39
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 79.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 254
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 795
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.38
5% 8.03 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.48 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 (P80) 3TE2 960GB
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K19C18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 523 400 219 217 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
Read 790
Write 457
Mixed 416
SusWrite 344
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 40.7
147% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 152
148% 236 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
17GB free, PID 00ed, PNY USB 3.0
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 105
Write 24.2
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 17.6
34% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-BGS2O5IK 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback