Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory42.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 15:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5507
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 57
2-Core 114
52% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1D05
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 96.8
Mixed 101
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.32
85% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB
8GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.1
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.16
17% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 6 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback