Today's hottest deals

HP Presario V3000 (GM192PA#UUF)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Presario V3000 (GM192PA#UUF)  (all builds)
MotherboardWistron 30B2
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20070602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo T2450
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 50.6
1-Core 17.1
2-Core 34.6
25% 34.1 Pts
4-Core 33.7
8-Core 35
5% 34.3 Pts
64-Core 32
2% 32 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.BHD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 31 30 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 30.3
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 30.9
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 24%
Samsung P3 Portable 500GB
365GB free, PID 61c3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 24 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 22.3
16% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback