Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory61.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 05:34
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 657
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2604 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 219
Parallax 214
129% 197 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 195
Splatting 138
127% 157 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 123%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Areca ARC-1882-VOL#000 28TB
19TB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: UDMA 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Areca ARC-1882-VOL#001 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel SSDPEDMW800G4 800GB
624GB free
Firmware: 8EV10135
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,794
Write 861
Mixed 1,140
279% 1,265 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 39.5
167% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 77.3
83% 135 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 182%
Great: 216%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 966
Write 498
Mixed 682
158% 715 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 29.3
129% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 78.6
88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 116%
Great: 214%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
140GB free
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 343
Write 341
Mixed 334
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 23.9
115% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 41.9
64% 119 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 111
Write 96.2
Mixed 89.4
74% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.25
91% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 106
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.09
82% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
654GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 162
Mixed 154
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.26
124% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 98%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
499GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 87.9
Write 87.2
Mixed 85.4
65% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.23
83% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 35.7
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback