Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 47.1 1-Core 56.1 2-Core 116 42% 73 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 488 43% 367 Pts	64-Core 1,005 62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 094E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.82 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 2 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.85 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 147 162 153 164 167 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 163 Mixed 74 SusWrite 154 103% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GB 1,002 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.1% Average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 14.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	67x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples	48x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	80x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	38x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	26x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	37x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	29x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	28x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94