Today's hottest deals

Samsung RV415/RV515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung RV415/RV515  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV415/RV415
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 17:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 39.3
1-Core 14
2-Core 22.9
19% 25.4 Pts
4-Core 24.3
8-Core 25.8
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 28
2% 28 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Sanyo(144D C648) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.22 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM0 01 HN-M320MBB 320GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 39 30 35 34 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 11
Write 37.3
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 33.2
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV415/RV515 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV415/RV515

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback