Huananzhi X58

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X58 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 141 60% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 430 42% 347 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Lighting 83.8 Reflection 77.3 Parallax 73.8 68% 78.3 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 77.6 Splatting 58.7 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2316RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 234 237 237 237 237 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.4% Above average	Read 248 Write 236 Mixed 165 SusWrite 236 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 24 86% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 112 105% 163 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79 6,615 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 202GB free Firmware: 3.AAM SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 70 69 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 76.9 Write 77.4 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 69.8 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 44%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 15.9 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 15.9 25% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.4 158% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.3% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.9 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 10 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	29x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	20x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	16x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MZ7KM240HMHQ0D3 240GBBench 98%, 30 samples	7x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	5x

RAM
1x33GB^Y[fXfPV(@XZBench 31%, 36 samples	12x
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 37GBUnknownBench 43%, 9 samples	7x
HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GBHynixBench 49%, 6 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16