HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2330
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 08:22
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 62
34% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 112
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 216F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2.69
2% 3.04 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: T181207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 291 312 279 316 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 342
Write 365
Mixed 314
SusWrite 269
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 18.5
62% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 138
109% 146 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 92%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 114 123 109 121 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.1% Poor
Read 91.8
Write 93.2
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 112
22% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 11.7
44% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 27.1
21% 28 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata ADDS1600W4G11-B 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback