Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac12,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple iMac12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B5BF58194151B
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 23:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$60
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 140
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 229
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Apple(106B 6741) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 5.34
6% 6.35 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 7.13
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP72
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 26 27 41 51 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 48.8
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 38.5
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 17%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.2 6.2 5.8 5.8 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 6
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1
53% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac12,1 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback