Today's hottest deals

Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411
Memory0.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 06:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 28.7
36% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 53.3
8-Core 61.9
8% 57.6 Pts
64-Core 56
4% 56 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C581) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.65
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 185 185 186 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 196
Write 190
Mixed 143
SusWrite 182
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 13.1
45% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 97.2
80% 115 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B2873EH1-CF8 80CE M471B5773CHS-CF8 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 1.1
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback