Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '20 at 10:35
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 148 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 277 36% 272 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 17.6 15% 17.1 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 19.7 15% 18 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H7 128GB 485 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 114 104 89 100 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 218 Write 151 Mixed 170 SusWrite 104 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 13.3 45% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 104 94% 144 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 171GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 94 95 94 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 93 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 94.5 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 70%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 636GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 98 98 97 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 77.8 Write 79.8 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 96 59% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 44GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16