Today's hottest deals

Asus A55BM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A55BM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 15:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 108
50% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 115
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 96.9
6% 96.9 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.8 14 12 12 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 22
Write 34.8
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 12.5
15% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 113 115 116 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 115
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55BM-PLUS Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback