| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161007 |
| Uptime | 20.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 23 '20 at 19:36 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61%
Good
|
63% 110 Pts
|
39% 290 Pts
|
18% 294 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
77.4%
Very good
|
78% 95.2 fps
|
77% 96.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
79GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 261 334 368 363 378 MB/s
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
87% 385 MB/s
|
144% 51.7 MB/s
|
233% 330 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 89 65 97 100 99 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
78% 106 MB/s
|
184% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 1315 CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
49.2%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
40% 99.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 807 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $61
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $48Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 119x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 91x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 94x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 74x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $275 |