Asrock E350M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock E350M1  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140306
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateAug 24 '20 at 21:35
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350D APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Memory 36.7
1-Core 3.9
2-Core 12.5
14% 17.7 Pts
4-Core 23.1
8-Core 25.6
3% 24.4 Pts
64-Core 28.6
2% 28.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
ASRock(1849 9802) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.18 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 44 39 49 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 54.8
Write 40.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 40.4
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
417GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 61 70 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 102
Write 94.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 63.7
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
431GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 62 70 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 109
Write 72.4
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 64.2
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP004GBLTU133N02 Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.65% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 1
4% 1.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E350M1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock E350M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback